🔗 Share this article

Each time a prominent prize-giving event approaches, you'll find an outcry for introducing additional classifications to acknowledge unsung work and fill the hearts of followers dedicated to specific genres.

My colleague has already made advocating for terror-themed awards. That would rule. The same goes for board games, representing a passionate advocate's mission. Yet I need to apologize in advance when I prioritize since similar to single-minded supporters, I possess a compelling case supporting my request is the most urgent and important of all. This is the request: It's essential to create an award type for logic-based games.

Categorizing Game Types

Classifying creative works defies precise measurement; it remains highly personal, and typically start arguments resulting in unclear classifications. It's understandable that cinema institutions avoid this approach. However, it represents an unavoidable compromise for the industry of gaming, which are so diverse they barely qualify as a single art form.

To recognize the complete range of interactive entertainment excellence to be recognized, and for games of all stripes to receive proper recognition, specific award classifications remain vital.

Present Award Structure

Prominent interactive entertainment events presently include award types recognizing Action-oriented games, Adventure-action titles, RPG experiences, Fighting, Simulation and strategy titles, plus athletic and racing experiences. Together, these six categories successfully include a lot of ground, and you can find room for most games within them.

Different situation exists for logic-based experiences. No suitable classification appears to put them. Think about these recent excellent titles, showing diverse approaches: building puzzles in a particular game, fast-paced pattern recognition of another game, engaging interpersonal challenges in another game. Where could they possibly go between these six categories? Nowhere, that’s where.

Recognition Challenges

Many instances occur of brilliant puzzle games released every year that have no home at major award shows, if they accidentally match for categories like Mobile Game, Virtual reality experiences, or the intensely contested small studio competitions.

• An iconic brain-teaser received no recognition completely in 2014
• Another imaginative release received no nominations that year
• A beloved organization game received no acknowledgment that year
• Only a few puzzle games barely qualified for small studio or handheld classifications

Importance of Logic Titles

Commonly they're small games, however the design of the puzzle game is of massive significance. Well-known matching games stand as most popular titles globally continuing this trend for over a decade.

The legendary block-stacking game challenges famous sandbox experiences for the title of highest-selling title ever; it additionally competes for best game of all time. Brain-teasers form essential building blocks to the art of video games, and they are in conversation with almost every other genre.

Recommendation and Reasoning

Puzzle games wouldn’t have this problem. You could fill five nominees engaging, different, qualified experiences annually without trouble — or rather, with difficulty, since numerous excellent numerous deserving experiences.

To emphasize again, these include experiences without proper classification in important events. Brain-teaser creators function at the demanding boundary game development, creating some of the purest expressions of the video game form. Comparable to movie stunt professionals, they deserve recognition. We shouldn't delay 35 years.