🔗 Share this article

The action by the Democratic National Committee to withhold the publication of its internal post-election analysis on the 2024 election appears stunning but not surprising. Resistant to unpleasant candor, the DNC operates closer to a communications shop than a political organization devoted to cultivating grassroots capacities capable of prevailing at the polls.

An Environment of Conformity

Hesitant to challenge the prevailing attitude of conformity, the DNC has continued within the Biden-Harris shadow throughout this past year. Releasing the findings might have shown that the leadership are interested to encourage open debate regarding the missteps that enabled the former president to win re-election. However, the DNC is proceeding under the pretense that there's nothing to be learned from the stunning loss from the last cycle.

The top priority: is this good for winning elections? Should the answer be negative, it is an unnecessary diversion from the core mission," an explanation reportedly given to justify concealing the report.

Major Failures an Autopsy Might Have Examined

An autopsy report worth its salt would confront a series of difficult topics. Among them are:

• Electoral Disenchantment: The loss among a significant portion of the electorate who supported the Democratic ticket in 2020 proved pivotal in the close recent race.
• A Decision to Run: The determined choice by the incumbent to run again, coupled with a last-minute exit, is seen by some as robbing Democratic voters of a genuine choice.
• Abandoning the Working-Class Base: While facing rising costs, the electoral effort allegedly accommodating elite contributors and not managing to challenge the impact of big business.
• The Gaza Impact: An unwillingness to adjust an approach on a major international conflict reportedly led to alienating significant blocs, particularly with youth voters, Arab-Americans, and Muslim Americans.
• Losing Young Voter Allegiance: Extensive evidence shows a major decrease in Democratic support from voters aged 18-29.

A Pattern Avoiding Accountability

Choosing secrecy fits a pattern of evading uncomfortable facts. It recalls an episode in which the vast majority of elected Democrat in Congress supported a sitting president's insistence on running for re-election right up until a disastrous public debate performance led to a reversal.

Concurrently, overwhelming numbers within the party's base were continually telling researchers of their opposition to the incumbent to run again.

Campaign Spending Questions

A thorough autopsy might also investigate issues about where money went, including the amounts went to high-priced advisors and advertising contractors during a campaign which expended a staggering war chest during the general election.

The Underlying Implication

Ultimately, the suppression regarding the analysis is symptomatic of a submission to the existing power structure who engineered a disastrous electoral effort. The implication for ordinary supporters – including millions of dedicated activists – is that they do not have a right to see the lessons the leadership claim to have learned based on a report compiled from feedback from all states.

A political entity unwilling to honestly assess its mistakes is unlikely to climb out of the cycle which was so advantageous to their opponents.